![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Robert R. Barron, former Senior
CIA Disguise Specialist,
Prosthetic Ears Versus Ear Reconstructive Surgery Parents are always looking for a solution to correct their child's ear deformity, i.e., Microtia, Artesia, Goldenhar Syndrome, and Treacher Collins Syndrome. I am obviously very close to, and concerned about continuing the promotion and practice of ear reconstructive surgery. My goal over the past nine years has been to reproduce replacement anatomy to the best of my abilities. Whenever I encounter someone who does not share the same goal, I tend to express my views rather passionately. It has been my experience that when a person comes to me with a less than adequate prosthesis, they're only out the cost of the item, and it is easily replaced. When they come to me with a surgically disfigured attempt at ear reconstructive surgery, my options, and their last hopes, for a realistic anatomical replacement are limited. Also, I am devastated to hear this non-predictable procedure continues to be recommended for younger patients. Some of the reasons why the operations fall short of looking like a normal ear are as follows:
Ear reconstructive surgery is always an option, however it is not reversible. Prosthetic restoration is reversible. A question for physicians who still practice this surgical travesty - "I wonder what option you would choose if the choice were on a personal level?" NOTE: click on images to enlarge in a new window
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20608 Gordon Park Square, Suite
150
Ashburn, Virginia 20147
703.723.4668 tel/703.723.7130 fax
cpdrbarron@prosthesis.com
Last update: 14 Jul 2008